DATA · PUBLISHED OCT 14, 2026 · CC BY 4.0

Where Texas aerobic maintenance providers are based

1,357 licensed OSSF maintenance providers and 1,188 maintenance technicians have a Texas county on their license, the county of their mailing address. Providers are based in 152 of Texas’s 254 counties. Montgomery County has the most, 75, and the ten counties with the most hold 27.1% of all providers.

Where maintenance providers are based

Eight counties with the most licensed maintenance providers based there, from the maintained TCEQ register. Mailing county is not the provider’s service area.

  1. Montgomery75
  2. Harris55
  3. Comal34
  4. Hays32
  5. Brazoria31
  6. Johnson31
  7. Hunt31
  8. Bexar31

Key findings

  1. 1,357 licensed OSSF maintenance providers and 1,188 maintenance technicians have a Texas county on their license, the county of their mailing address.
  2. Providers are based in 152 of Texas’s 254 counties. Montgomery County has the most, 75, and the ten counties with the most hold 27.1% of all providers.
  3. 25 counties permitted aerobic systems from 2015 to 2025 but have no maintenance provider based in them: 2,427 aerobic authorizations between them, so any provider working there is based in another county.
  4. Statewide there were about 215 aerobic authorizations recorded by county from 2015 to 2025 for each provider. Across the 8 TCEQ regions with at least 50 providers it runs from about 150 in Region 14 (Corpus Christi) to about 280 in Region 04 (DFW Metroplex), on permits recorded by county.

By TCEQ region

Providers usually work within reach of their base, so a region is a fairer unit than a county for comparing providers with permits. Permits per provider is shown only where at least 50 providers are based, and it leaves out systems a TCEQ regional office permits directly (see method and limits), so it is a floor, not an exact figure.

Licensed maintenance providers and technicians based in each TCEQ region, with aerobic permits 2015–2025
REGION PROVIDERS BASED HERE TECHNICIANS AEROBIC PERMITS 2015–25 PERMITS PER PROVIDER
Region 04 (DFW Metroplex) 291 343 81,351 280
Region 12 (Houston) 282 246 66,761 237
Region 05 (Tyler) 146 105 32,704 224
Region 09 (Waco) 146 111 25,048 172
Region 13 (San Antonio) 141 157 30,428 216
Region 11 (Austin) 140 116 28,477 203
Region 10 (Beaumont) 84 41 15,020 179
Region 14 (Corpus Christi) 58 42 8,683 150
Region 03 (Abilene) 39 16 2,754 —
Region 07 (Midland) 6 4 147 —
Region 08 (San Angelo) 6 1 158 —
Region 15 (Harlingen) 5 0 5 —
Region 01 (Amarillo) 4 5 48 —
Region 02 (Lubbock) 4 0 8 —
Region 16 (Laredo) 4 0 324 —
Region 06 (El Paso) 1 1 0 —

Counties with aerobic permits and no provider based there

25 counties permitted aerobic systems from 2015 to 2025 but have no maintenance provider based in them: 2,427 aerobic authorizations between them, so any provider working there is based in another county.

Counties with aerobic authorizations 2015–2025 and no licensed maintenance provider based in them
COUNTY REGION AEROBIC PERMITS 2015–25
Calhoun Region 14 (Corpus Christi) 880
San Augustine Region 10 (Beaumont) 621
Newton Region 10 (Beaumont) 315
Refugio Region 14 (Corpus Christi) 197
Delta Region 05 (Tyler) 177
Real Region 13 (San Antonio) 52
Mills Region 09 (Waco) 37
Frio Region 13 (San Antonio) 32
Live Oak Region 14 (Corpus Christi) 28
Kimble Region 08 (San Angelo) 18
McCulloch Region 08 (San Angelo) 13
Coleman Region 03 (Abilene) 10
Menard Region 08 (San Angelo) 10
Potter Region 01 (Amarillo) 8
Throckmorton Region 03 (Abilene) 5
Winkler Region 07 (Midland) 5
Archer Region 03 (Abilene) 4
Kinney Region 16 (Laredo) 4
Clay Region 03 (Abilene) 3
McMullen Region 16 (Laredo) 3
Andrews Region 07 (Midland) 1
Garza Region 02 (Lubbock) 1
Hutchinson Region 01 (Amarillo) 1
Scurry Region 03 (Abilene) 1
Zavala Region 16 (Laredo) 1

All 254 counties

Sorted by providers based in the county. Each county name links to its page, with the permitting authority and how the maintenance report is filed there.

Licensed maintenance providers and technicians based in each Texas county, with aerobic permits 2015–2025
COUNTY PROVIDERS TECHNICIANS AEROBIC 2015–25
Montgomery 75 75 21,617
Harris 55 49 7,931
Comal 34 38 13,846
Hays 32 32 5,183
Brazoria 31 29 8,356
Johnson 31 18 7,176
Hunt 31 32 6,585
Bexar 31 30 6,024
Bastrop 25 14 7,337
Fort Bend 23 15 5,470
McLennan 23 18 3,899
Williamson 23 16 3,649
Brazos 23 6 3,027
Parker 22 27 11,707
Grayson 22 25 6,061
Kaufman 22 34 5,574
Travis 22 26 5,065
Hood 22 25 4,503
Smith 21 10 5,999
Bell 21 34 5,293
Collin 20 12 8,433
Denton 20 34 6,546
Liberty 18 6 6,168
Wise 18 8 3,613
Walker 18 13 3,423
Ellis 17 24 6,022
Kendall 16 38 1,753
Waller 15 18 3,331
Henderson 14 32 3,079
Aransas 14 8 782
Guadalupe 13 13 2,709
Polk 13 21 2,134
Wharton 13 19 1,691
Kerr 13 19 1,063
Angelina 12 6 3,440
Grimes 12 16 2,549
Cooke 12 4 2,093
Caldwell 12 7 1,963
Taylor 12 2 1,096
Van Zandt 11 19 4,085
Galveston 11 7 3,940
Hill 11 3 1,960
Victoria 11 10 1,783
Coryell 11 10 572
Wood 10 9 2,812
Hopkins 10 8 1,871
Cherokee 10 0 1,414
Anderson 10 3 895
Bandera 10 6 788
Hardin 10 2 0
Tarrant 9 11 3,376
Navarro 9 30 2,311
Orange 9 1 1,867
Fayette 9 2 1,296
Fannin 8 29 2,734
Jefferson 8 1 1,596
Gregg 8 4 1,571
Wilson 8 4 1,388
Gillespie 8 4 1,012
Erath 8 2 939
Camp 8 1 931
Austin 8 3 915
Leon 8 1 763
Brown 8 3 481
Lampasas 7 6 587
Washington 7 2 199
Jasper 7 2 164
Harrison 6 5 1,704
Chambers 6 4 1,583
Nacogdoches 6 3 1,543
Matagorda 6 7 1,530
Burleson 6 3 1,488
Lamar 6 3 1,272
Lavaca 6 0 1,050
Dallas 6 5 823
San Jacinto 5 1 1,710
Rockwall 5 17 1,540
Rains 5 2 868
Bowie 5 3 806
Palo Pinto 5 5 652
Llano 5 12 352
Upshur 4 2 1,983
Burnet 4 5 1,935
Nueces 4 1 1,686
Lee 4 2 907
Blanco 4 0 790
Sabine 4 0 704
Somervell 4 1 663
Milam 4 2 622
Hidalgo 4 0 5
Goliad 4 4 0
Medina 3 3 1,390
Limestone 3 1 950
Colorado 3 1 806
Jackson 3 13 749
Gonzales 3 0 697
Trinity 3 1 477
San Patricio 3 1 407
Houston 3 1 406
Wichita 3 3 295
DeWitt 3 2 274
Red River 3 0 260
Cass 3 1 250
Morris 3 0 200
Young 3 0 91
Tom Green 3 1 76
Stephens 3 2 53
Jim Wells 3 3 48
Tyler 3 1 43
Randall 3 3 39
Rusk 2 1 981
Madison 2 2 732
Franklin 2 0 722
Bosque 2 5 506
Titus 2 1 489
Val Verde 2 0 301
Atascosa 2 1 200
Karnes 2 1 167
Callahan 2 0 104
Ector 2 2 99
Bee 2 0 94
Eastland 2 0 64
Jack 2 0 62
San Saba 2 0 16
Kleberg 2 0 8
Lubbock 2 0 5
Panola 2 1 0
Robertson 1 0 635
Freestone 1 0 540
Falls 1 2 534
Montague 1 1 354
Marion 1 0 335
Hamilton 1 0 139
Comanche 1 0 84
Jones 1 0 47
Mason 1 0 40
Midland 1 0 40
Webb 1 0 15
Edwards 1 0 4
Lynn 1 0 2
Coke 1 0 1
Gaines 1 1 1
Howard 1 0 1
Cameron 1 0 0
El Paso 1 1 0
Hockley 1 0 0
La Salle 1 0 0
Martin 1 0 0
Ochiltree 1 0 0
Runnels 1 0 0
Schleicher 1 0 0
Shelby 1 1 0
Calhoun 0 0 880
San Augustine 0 0 621
Newton 0 0 315
Refugio 0 0 197
Delta 0 0 177
Real 0 0 52
Mills 0 0 37
Frio 0 0 32
Live Oak 0 0 28
Kimble 0 0 18
McCulloch 0 0 13
Coleman 0 0 10
Menard 0 0 10
Potter 0 2 8
Throckmorton 0 0 5
Winkler 0 0 5
Archer 0 5 4
Kinney 0 0 4
Clay 0 0 3
McMullen 0 0 3
Andrews 0 0 1
Garza 0 0 1
Hutchinson 0 0 1
Scurry 0 0 1
Zavala 0 0 1
Armstrong 0 0 0
Bailey 0 0 0
Baylor 0 0 0
Borden 0 0 0
Brewster 0 0 0
Briscoe 0 0 0
Brooks 0 0 0
Carson 0 0 0
Castro 0 0 0
Childress 0 0 0
Cochran 0 0 0
Collingsworth 0 0 0
Concho 0 0 0
Cottle 0 0 0
Crane 0 0 0
Crockett 0 0 0
Crosby 0 0 0
Culberson 0 0 0
Dallam 0 0 0
Dawson 0 0 0
Deaf Smith 0 0 0
Dickens 0 0 0
Dimmit 0 0 0
Donley 0 0 0
Duval 0 0 0
Fisher 0 0 0
Floyd 0 0 0
Foard 0 0 0
Glasscock 0 0 0
Gray 0 0 0
Hale 0 0 0
Hall 0 0 0
Hansford 0 0 0
Hardeman 0 0 0
Hartley 0 0 0
Haskell 0 0 0
Hemphill 0 0 0
Hudspeth 0 0 0
Irion 0 0 0
Jeff Davis 0 0 0
Jim Hogg 0 0 0
Kenedy 0 0 0
Kent 0 0 0
King 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0
Lamb 0 0 0
Lipscomb 0 0 0
Loving 0 0 0
Maverick 0 0 0
Mitchell 0 0 0
Moore 0 0 0
Motley 0 0 0
Nolan 0 0 0
Oldham 0 0 0
Parmer 0 0 0
Pecos 0 0 0
Presidio 0 0 0
Reagan 0 0 0
Reeves 0 0 0
Roberts 0 0 0
Shackelford 0 0 0
Sherman 0 0 0
Starr 0 0 0
Sterling 0 0 0
Stonewall 0 0 0
Sutton 0 0 0
Swisher 0 0 0
Terrell 0 0 0
Terry 0 0 0
Upton 0 0 0
Uvalde 0 0 0
Ward 0 1 0
Wheeler 0 0 0
Wilbarger 0 0 0
Willacy 0 0 0
Yoakum 0 0 0
Zapata 0 0 0

Method and limits

  • Providers and technicians are current OSSF Maintenance Provider licenses and Maintenance Technician registrations in the TCEQ license register, as read on Oct 5, 2026.
  • Each is counted once, in the county of the licensee’s mailing address. That is where a provider is based, not where it works. Seven provider licenses and three technician registrations with a blank county or an out-of-state address are left out.
  • A license is a person, not a company. A company with three licensed providers counts three times.
  • Aerobic permits are surface (spray) plus drip Authorizations to Construct from the eleven TCEQ “Types of Systems Installed” reports, 2015–2025. Systems a TCEQ regional office permits directly are reported by region, not by county, so they are not in these counts. That affects large regions too: in 2024 alone TCEQ reported 1,118 such authorizations statewide, 348 of them in Region 10 (Beaumont) and 272 in Region 04 (DFW Metroplex), all system types. Permits per provider therefore understates the true figure wherever a regional office permits directly.
  • Everything here is recomputed from the per-county rows in the CSV, which anyone can check.

How we research and check our data. Not legal advice.

How to cite this page

DulyTrack, “Where Texas aerobic maintenance providers are based,” Oct 14, 2026, https://dulytrack.com/data/texas-maintenance-providers-by-county. Data: TCEQ OSSF license register and “Types of Systems Installed” reports, 2015–2025. CC BY 4.0.

Free to reuse with attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Common questions

How many licensed aerobic maintenance providers are there in Texas?

1,357 licensed OSSF maintenance providers and 1,188 maintenance technicians have a Texas county on their license, the county of their mailing address.

Which Texas county has the most maintenance providers based in it?

Providers are based in 152 of Texas’s 254 counties. Montgomery County has the most, 75, and the ten counties with the most hold 27.1% of all providers.

Are there Texas counties with aerobic systems but no maintenance provider based in them?

25 counties permitted aerobic systems from 2015 to 2025 but have no maintenance provider based in them: 2,427 aerobic authorizations between them, so any provider working there is based in another county.

Does a provider’s county mean that is where they work?

No. The county on a TCEQ license is the county of the licensee’s mailing address. Providers routinely work in neighboring counties, so these figures show where providers are based, not which counties they serve.

Permits by year are in the open dataset and the 2025 report. How to become a provider is on the licensing page.